Susan Cushing
April 6, 2020
Nathaniel Mack III: The Mack Attack
VIEW LATEST ISSUES
Florida Supreme Court blocks assault weapon ban from ballot [AP News]
Judge: $750K bail for 3 ex-officers accused in Floyd’s death [AP News]
States sue to block DeVos’ campus sexual assault overhaul [AP News]
ACLU sues over police force on protesters near White House [AP News]
U.S. Supreme Court upholds Puerto Rico financial oversight board [AP News]
High court declines to take up Sanders supporters’ lawsuit [AP News]
Top: Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School walkout in honor of the 17 victims killed at the school (Mike Stocker/South Florida Sun-Sentinel via AP, File) Bottom: Police clear demonstrators near the White House. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
LATEST TALK OF THE TOWN
Ogletree Deakins Welcomes Adam Courtin as Of Counsel
SAN ANTONIO, TX—Ogletree Deakins’ San Antonio office is excited to welcome its newest Of Counsel, Adam Courtin. Courtin […]
Cordell & Cordell's Amanda Clepper Harrison Named 2020 Texas Rising Star
SAN ANTONIO, TX—Cordell & Cordell Regional Managing Attorney Amanda Clepper Harrison was named to the 2020 Texas […]
Jackson Walker Expands Real Estate and Transactional Practices With 4 Attorneys
SAN ANTONIO, TX—During the month of January, Jackson Walker proudly welcomed Joe Flack, David Parker, and John […]
Load More
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Practice Management
