Susan Cushing
April 6, 2020
Nathaniel Mack III: The Mack Attack
VIEW LATEST ISSUES
Supreme Court clears the way for executions of federal prisoners [AP News]
Judge rules against man challenging NH city’s mask rules [AP News]
Supreme Court to hear Georgia Gwinnet College case about religion, free speech [Washington Times]
Federal judge voids Georgia ‘heartbeat’ abortion restriction [AP News]
Immigration courts reopen despite rising coronavirus cases [AP News]
Nebraska high court rejects move to allow skipping bar exam [AP News]
Bottom: Georgia's Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signing abortion legislation (Bob Andres/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP, File)
LATEST TALK OF THE TOWN
Ogletree Deakins Welcomes Adam Courtin as Of Counsel
SAN ANTONIO, TX—Ogletree Deakins’ San Antonio office is excited to welcome its newest Of Counsel, Adam Courtin. Courtin […]
Cordell & Cordell's Amanda Clepper Harrison Named 2020 Texas Rising Star
SAN ANTONIO, TX—Cordell & Cordell Regional Managing Attorney Amanda Clepper Harrison was named to the 2020 Texas […]
Jackson Walker Expands Real Estate and Transactional Practices With 4 Attorneys
SAN ANTONIO, TX—During the month of January, Jackson Walker proudly welcomed Joe Flack, David Parker, and John […]
Load More
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Which justice joined in part, except as to footnote 9, and filed his or her own dissenting opinion?
Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Which justice joined in part, except as to footnote 9, and filed his or her own dissenting opinion?