Voting Issues for Noncitizens

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on email

With America fixated on the drama of this year’s presidential election, increasing attention has been paid to the number of new voter enrollees. For years, states have been enacting tougher voter ID laws to help weed out voter fraud. While these new voting laws may help avoid individuals ineligible to vote from casting a ballot, the immigration consequences associated with unauthorized registrations and voting present a more complicated issue.

In 1993, Congress enacted the National Voter Registration Act (also known as the Motor Voter Act) to enhance the voting opportunities for all Americans. Th e act requires states to provide voter registration for federal elections by three means: (1) provide voter registration forms at the same time they apply for a driver’s license or renew a driver’s license; (2) offer voter registration opportunities at all offices that provide public assistance and state-funded programs; and (3) permit mail-in voter registration forms. Th e act unabashedly sought to increase the number of registered voters by encouraging registration at the most common sources of civilian interaction with government.

While the civic notions of increasing voter turnout may be noble, the immigration consequences for the unwitting registrant are unforgiving. Unlawful voting and false claims to U.S. citizenship are deportable offenses in the United States. INA §237(a)(3) (D), 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(3)(D). While many noncitizens will recognize their ineligibility, not all of them will. Th ere are many factors that are likely to create confusion and lead noncitizens to mistakenly register to vote, including:

  1. Noncitizens are oft en unfamiliar with U.S. laws and voting requirements.
  2. Few individuals are charged with informing noncitizens of their ineligibility to register or to vote. In fact, many organizations reward registrars who deliver the most registrations.
  3. Registrants presume their eligibility when provided a voter registration card by a government employee.
  4. Language barriers prevent noncitizens from comprehending voting registration and voting requirements.
  5. Most noncitizens complete immense amounts of documentation and applications prior to and aft er their arrival in the United States. When provided a lengthy voter registration form by a government worker, applicants assume their eligibility and simply sign away.
  6. Poor training can lead a government employee to mislead or even encourage ineligible registration.
  7. Following submission of the registration card, the noncitizen assumes they’ve been cleared to vote, thus increasing the likelihood of their casting a ballot.

While any one factor may not sufficiently explain an errant enrollment, when viewed cumulatively, the chances of such an error being committed becomes increasingly understandable. While the inadvertent registration for a lawful permanent resident may in some cases be remedied without resulting in their removal, the registrant that has yet to achieve permanent residency status incurs a much stiffer penalty. Traditional routes to obtaining residency status are oft en foreclosed entirely with only limited options for avoiding deportation. Moreover, most false claim scenarios with respect to voter registration and voting arise from largely innocent actors – scant evidence shows that foreign nationals are registering to vote to manipulate U.S. elections. Most anecdotal evidence suggests these registrations are accidents.

Completing a voter registration form represents an exceedingly easy, but dangerous grounds upon which a noncitizen can mistakenly indicate him or herself to be a citizen. Further, any person who has voted in violation of any federal, state or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, or regulation is deportable; a conviction is not required. INA §237(a)(6), 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(6); 22 C.F.R. §40.104. If the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) places a person who has unlawfully voted into removal proceedings, DHS must prove that a violation occurred under the voting statute. Depending on the statue, DHS may be required to prove that the individual acted knowingly or willfully. See Woodby v. INS, 385 U.S. 276 (1966).

However, in Ohio and a few other states, the voting statute provides no mens rea requirement. Case law now suggests that the purpose of the Ohio statute was to impose strict liability upon violators, which provides no defense from removal for the individual who mistakenly or unknowingly votes in Ohio. While the policy of improving civic engagement represents the idealism behind the founding of the country, the penalty for those that run afoul of voter registration laws is oft en harsher than for those that commit crimes and fraud. Moreover, although individuals seeking to manipulate elections should face penalties commensurate with such behavior, determining whether an otherwise innocent mistake should garner such a severe response deserves a rethinking of the punishments that our laws place on regulatory violations. Erin P. Brown

Larry Wright Advertising

Latest Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *