Why I’ll Never Stop Talking About Dr. Death

In addition to being known for J.R. Ewing, The Dallas Cowboys and big hair, Dallas will also be forever known as the home of Dr. Death. In case you have been living under a rock, Dr. Death is Christopher Duntsch, a young neurosurgeon who came to Dallas and ended up leaving a trail of maimed and dead patients in his wake before his medical license was eventually suspended. He now is serving a life sentence for his crimes.

The story of what happened is so horrifying that it became the subject of a hit podcast, a made-for-TV movie, and a documentary. OK, so the story has been told and re-told, so why am I still talking about it?

The story of what happened is widely available, but how and why it happened is a story that needs to be told and re-told until serious reform is undertaken.

Christopher Duntsch was not the first physician who was incompetent, impaired, dangerous or a combination thereof. He didn’t create the problem, but he has become a poster child for it. Similarly, sending Duntsch to prison for life didn’t solve the problem. Yes, I will venture to say that there are incompetent, impaired and/or dangerous doctors practicing in Dallas at the very moment that you are reading this.

The Duntsch cases are not the first time that residency programs, hospitals and medical boards failed to protect patients and, I am sorry to say, it won’t be the last. But, why?

No. 1: RESIDENCY PROGRAMS

The purpose of a residency program is for physicians to master complex procedures, develop excellent clinical judgment and be fully prepared to practice in their respective field of specialty at or above the standard of care. A physician who does not have the requisite mental capacity or technical skills to deliver appropriate patient care should not be allowed to graduate. There is a system of checks and balances to allow for the time for close observation to ensure that physicians are competent and safe. When the residency program doesn’t fulfill its mission, there should be severe consequences. The agency that regulates residency programs is the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).

Despite the egregious lapses of the University of Tennessee Residency Program, it remains unscathed and free of any repercussions.

No. 2: HOSPITALS

There are more requirements on hospitals to “police” their physicians than I have time to get into in the space I am allotted for this article. In sum, let’s wrap them into a bundle called “Quality Assurance.” This means hospitals have an absolute obligation to not put dangerous doctors on their staff, to remove dangerous doctors from their staff and to report dangerous doctors to the medical board and the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) to warn others so that dangerous doctors cannot go from hospital to hospital and harm more patients.

Currently, there are no regulatory agencies that are enforcing the law or penalizing hospitals who do not comply with their obligations. In Texas, the law continues to place an onerous burden on patients to prove a hospital’s violation of their obligation and continues to keep secret the evidence one would need to prove a violation.

No. 3: MEDICAL BOARDS

Among other things, medical boards rely on hospitals to notify them of dangerous doctors. The Texas Medical Board receives all manner of complaints but a complaint from a hospital is taken very seriously. Complaints from other doctors are also supposed to be taken very seriously. For decades, the Texas Medical Board has excused its impotency due to lack of funding and resources.

The Texas Medical Board received no repercussions for its delay in removing Duntsch from practice despite numerous complaints, nor have there been any improvements in funding and resources to enable them to do a better job.

What I have had the space to explain here is the tip of the Iceberg. I just cannot emphasize enough that the institutional conditions which created and fostered Christopher Duntsch existed long before he came along and absolutely nothing has been done to correct the conditions which allowed him to get away with hurting so many people.

If the case of Dr. Death wasn’t enough to escalate much needed reform, I do not know what it will take. That is why I will never stop talking about it.

Comments 1

  1. Jack Brown says:

    I’m curious as to the “why” behind all of this. If Duntsch only had 100 or so hours logged in his residency program, why did they let him through? And why did they protect him after the fact? If Baylor Plano clearly knew he was incompetent or maniacal, why didn’t they report him to the NPDB? I get the fear of a wrongful termination suit, but that seems like it would obviously not hold up. Also, why would the TMB not seem to not even care about what’s going on? Dr. Henderson and Dr. Kirby both had to get police involved into something the TMB should have done.

    It seems like there’s a string of events that don’t make sense. I agree with you that it is wrong that no punishments or sanctions have been brought upon these institutions, but why did it happen in the first place? It seems like he conned his way into the position he was in, but I don’t understand why people would keep vouching for him after he leaves patients dead.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Get Advice

Find a Lawyer   /   Ask a Question   /   Articles   /   About    Contact  

© Copyright 2022 | Attorney at Law Magazine | Privacy Policy