A good rule of thumb for most is to keep profanity out one’s work product (unless you’re a rapper; and then it’s expected). Decorum in the courtroom is important, as well as in our day-to-day interactions. Just as you should not utter certain words in court, it is likewise important not to put them in writing. The same is true
Family Law attorneys have been waiting impatiently for the release of the Minnesota Supreme Court decision in the case of Curtis v. Curtis. The decision, which was filed Nov. 16, 2016, represents the first decision by the Supreme Court in a long while on a substantive spousal maintenance issue and while it addresses the tax issue raised by the district
Four types of error are often discussed in appeals. The appellant argues that the lower court’s errors are reversible. Sometimes appellants also assert that errors are fundamental, as we explained in Vol. 4 No. 4 (“The Fundamental Error Exception to the Preservation-of- Error Rule”). Conversely, the appellee wants the order or judgment to be affirmed and usually argues that there
Recently it seems like not a day passes by, without a report of some form of government corruption in the news. In just the last few weeks, two high ranking Kern County police officers were convicted of smuggling drugs with the mafia; the attorney general of Pennsylvania was sentenced to five years in prison for perjury and obstruction; and our
A client called recently and shared the challenging situation she is experiencing. A family member passed the previous month, and she was named the executor. Her relative did not have a list of their online accounts and passwords; they merely had a cheat sheet hinting as to what existed online. My client is now in the awkward position of collecting
“The decision presents an instructive example of how a reversal may be obtained, when a trial court’s alimony award is not supported by sufficient factual findings.” Appellate court reversals of trial courts’ alimony awards are rare. The determination whether to make such an award is highly fact-driven and, in most cases, the trial court will write an alimony decision that
If you have ever reviewed a severance agreement on behalf of an employee, you have likely come across a series of acronyms like ADEA, ADA, ADAA, GINA, FMLA, WARN, OWBPA and ERISA, just to name a few. That agreement likely required the employee to release all of these claims, and many others, in exchange for some consideration. But did you
In October, I posted a blog on my law firm’s website celebrating the fact that corporate America’s most recent attack against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the agency, had been defeated. While the DC Court of Appeals held that the CFPB’s director could be removed by the president at will, rather than
As of Dec. 1, 2016, via the power of a single search warrant, the FBI can legally hack into an unlimited quantity of computers well-beyond the judicial district where said warrant is issued. Th is new expansion of power is a function of the recently amended Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 41 is a set
Irrespective of your political leanings, the Trump University class action is an interesting and unique case. It is also a good learning tool for one issue that comes up in nearly every consumer protection class action – reliance. In this article, we will explore the lawsuit, cutting through the political noise that surrounded it. The plaintiffs in the Trump University
A good rule of thumb for most is to keep profanity out one’s work product (unless you’re a rapper; and then it’s expected). Decorum in the courtroom is important, as well as in our day-to-day interactions. Just as you should not utter certain words in court, it is likewise important not to put them in writing. The same is true
Family Law attorneys have been waiting impatiently for the release of the Minnesota Supreme Court decision in the case of Curtis v. Curtis. The decision, which was filed Nov. 16, 2016, represents the first decision by the Supreme Court in a long while on a substantive spousal maintenance issue and while it addresses the tax issue raised by the district
Four types of error are often discussed in appeals. The appellant argues that the lower court’s errors are reversible. Sometimes appellants also assert that errors are fundamental, as we explained in Vol. 4 No. 4 (“The Fundamental Error Exception to the Preservation-of- Error Rule”). Conversely, the appellee wants the order or judgment to be affirmed and usually argues that there
Recently it seems like not a day passes by, without a report of some form of government corruption in the news. In just the last few weeks, two high ranking Kern County police officers were convicted of smuggling drugs with the mafia; the attorney general of Pennsylvania was sentenced to five years in prison for perjury and obstruction; and our
A client called recently and shared the challenging situation she is experiencing. A family member passed the previous month, and she was named the executor. Her relative did not have a list of their online accounts and passwords; they merely had a cheat sheet hinting as to what existed online. My client is now in the awkward position of collecting
“The decision presents an instructive example of how a reversal may be obtained, when a trial court’s alimony award is not supported by sufficient factual findings.” Appellate court reversals of trial courts’ alimony awards are rare. The determination whether to make such an award is highly fact-driven and, in most cases, the trial court will write an alimony decision that
If you have ever reviewed a severance agreement on behalf of an employee, you have likely come across a series of acronyms like ADEA, ADA, ADAA, GINA, FMLA, WARN, OWBPA and ERISA, just to name a few. That agreement likely required the employee to release all of these claims, and many others, in exchange for some consideration. But did you
In October, I posted a blog on my law firm’s website celebrating the fact that corporate America’s most recent attack against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the agency, had been defeated. While the DC Court of Appeals held that the CFPB’s director could be removed by the president at will, rather than
As of Dec. 1, 2016, via the power of a single search warrant, the FBI can legally hack into an unlimited quantity of computers well-beyond the judicial district where said warrant is issued. Th is new expansion of power is a function of the recently amended Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 41 is a set
Irrespective of your political leanings, the Trump University class action is an interesting and unique case. It is also a good learning tool for one issue that comes up in nearly every consumer protection class action – reliance. In this article, we will explore the lawsuit, cutting through the political noise that surrounded it. The plaintiffs in the Trump University
