Advertisement
Craig Petronella
March 17, 2020
CSI Cybersecurity: Your Client Was Hacked, Now What?
VIEW LATEST ISSUES
Judge rules Illinois governor’s order exceeded authority [AP News]
Yakama Nation to continue appeal against mining expansion [AP News]
Supreme Court blocks curbside voting in Alabama [AP News]
Appeals court overturns murder case in Eudora shooting death [AP News]
Supreme Court: Judges needn’t consider ability to pay costs [AP News]
Supreme Court agrees to hear Nazi art case [AP News]
Court rules in favor of Native Hawaiian homestead applicants [AP News]
Top: Michael Flynn (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File) Bottom: United States forward Megan Rapinoe (AP Photo/Steve Luciano, File)
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Ramos v. Louisiana case, which SCOTUS justice adopted a “dual-track” incorporation approach in Apodaca v. Oregon?
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
Recently cited in the Community Health Options v. United States case, which Federal Circuit judge filed a dissent which reasoned the riders could not "apply retroactively."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
In the recent SCOTUS case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. City Of New York, which justice filed the dissent, claiming, "This case is not moot."
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
The U.S. Supreme Court heard its first remote oral argument on Monday, May 4, 2020. Which case did they hear?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice wrote the unanimous opinion in Kelly v. United States et al., stating, " ... not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime"?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
Which Justice penned a dissent in Banister v. Davis, stating that the Fifth Circuit was correct to dismiss Banister’s untimely appeal?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
In Lomax v. Ortiz-Marques et Al., Lomax argued he hadn't violated the three-strike rule of the PLRA. Which appellate court rejected his argument before he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in DHS v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., stating "We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of
our concern'"?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Who penned the majority opinion in Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., stating the government-debt exception to the robocall law is unconstitutional?
Attorney at Law Magazine
March 16, 2020
Attorney Jaime H. Davis Hosts Book Signing
TALK OF THE TOWN
SCONC Chief Justice Cheri Beasley Delivered Her 2020 State of the Judiciary
RALEIGH, NC—Chief Justice Cheri Beasley delivered her 2020 State of the Judiciary on June 26, 2020. The […]
Associate Justice Anita Earls Named Co-Chair of Governor’s Task Force for Racial Equity in Criminal Justice
RALEIGH, NC—Supreme Court of North Carolina Associate Justice Anita Earls was named co-chair, along with North Carolina […]
Seven Bradley Attorneys Named to 2019 North Carolina Pro Bono Honor Society
CHARLOTTE, N.C—Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP is pleased to announce that seven attorneys in the firm’s Charlotte […]
Load More
