As an attorney with 30-plus years of experience in family law, I’ve seen nearly every reason under the sun for divorce. Currently, specific conservative segments within Congress are pushing to end no-fault divorce, which is presently legal in 17 states (California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, Washington and Wisconsin as well as Washington DC).
Although states set divorce laws, not the federal government, this legislation could significantly impact the parties involved, their children and legal professionals.
The Benefits of No-Fault Divorce
No-fault divorce has several significant benefits, especially for individuals in abusive relationships. Historically, proving fault in a divorce required one party to demonstrate wrongdoing by the other, such as adultery, cruelty or abandonment. This often required providing substantial evidence, which could be a dangerous task for victims of domestic violence.
When it comes to no-fault divorce, victims can file for divorce without needing to expose themselves to further harm or retaliation; they are able to voice their partner’s abuse and mistreatment in court. This system has provided a safer and more accessible route for individuals seeking to escape abusive marriages since the late 1960s.
Another benefit is that no-fault divorce simplifies the legal process, making it more efficient and less adversarial. Without the need to shine the light on one party’s wrongdoing, there’s also less need for contentious litigation because gathering evidence or presenting a case to demonstrate fault becomes unnecessary.
This streamlined proceeding means no-fault divorces usually follow a straightforward legal process, focusing on the dissolution of the marriage rather than the reasons behind it. As a result, there are often fewer court appearances, reduced expenses, and more straightforward paperwork.
Outside the courtroom, no-fault divorces also lessen the emotional strain on both parties by eliminating the need to assign blame in a public forum. This can lead to more amicable negotiations and settlements, making reaching agreements on issues such as property division, child custody, and support quicker and easier.
The Impact of Blocking No-Fault Divorce
If efforts from these conservative voices in Congress were to succeed in ending no-fault divorce, the implications would be significant. For starters, returning to a fault-based divorce system would likely increase the adversarial nature of divorce proceedings. Couples would be required to prove wrongdoing, leading to more contentious and protracted legal battles — and, in high-profile cases, media attention. This could result in increased legal costs and more significant emotional distress for everyone involved.
Also, individuals in abusive relationships might find it more difficult to leave their marriages as the need to provide evidence of abuse or other misconduct could deter victims from even seeking a divorce — trapping them in unsafe and unhealthy situations.
Removing no-fault divorce could also burden the judicial system more, as courts would need to adjudicate the validity of fault claims, further clogging an already overburdened system.
Turning Back the Clock
Beyond the immediate legal and personal implications, ending no-fault divorce could have broader societal impacts too. Divorce laws reflect societal values and norms regarding marriage and family. By making divorce more complicated and legally contentious, society could be signaling a return to more traditional and potentially restrictive views on marriage, especially for women.
Maintaining no-fault divorce is crucial for supporting individual autonomy and freedom. People should have the right to end a marriage that is no longer functional or fulfilling without having to endure a punitive legal process and personal harm. The ability to exit a marriage without assigning blame respects the individual dignity of both parties and acknowledges that sometimes relationships simply do not work out.
The push to end no-fault divorce raises critical questions about the role of the legal system in personal relationships and the balance between protecting individuals and promoting societal values. As the debate continues, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of such a significant shift in divorce law locally and nationally.
While not without its flaws, the current no-fault system offers a more pragmatic approach to the dissolution of marriage, prioritizing individuals’ safety, dignity, and autonomy. Ending no-fault divorce could turn back the clock on decades of progress in family law, making the path to personal freedom and safety more difficult for many – and, with that destructive outcome, there would be many people to blame.
Comments 4
I am conservative and going back to fault divorce seems to me to be anything but promoting values that I hold dear, like freedom, autonomy, and being able to decide for myself whether I want to remain married or not, whether there is fault or not. Going back to fault divorce exclusively, (I know some states have both fault and no-fault divorces) is asinine to say the least. These so-called conservative law makers are spending time on this instead of real issues facing this country, like the economy, border crisis, and the real fear that there will be another world war. I am just shaking my head in disbelief. Ronald Reagan, a conservative, was the first in the country to approve of no-fault divorce. It sickens me that anyone is pushing their religious values on others to trap (mostly women) in dead or abusive or even good marriages. ITS JUST NOT UP TO THEM!
OK, so who’s bird-brained idea is this? Make divorce MORE difficult? Really? Guess what? People will stop getting married altogether. No thanks, it’s too difficult to get out if something goes wrong. (No, I’m not married anymore, and I’m not looking to marry my partner either.)
I live in Louisiana, where it already takes like nine years to get a divorce even if it’s uncontested. Add fault and it takes even longer. Get one of those absurd “covenant marriages,” and you’re stuck, even if you’re in an abusive situation and your life is in danger.
Right now, in Texas, it takes 61 days to get a divorce if it’s just uncontested with no children or property settlements. Texas updated the laws just recently to streamline the process. Now the feds want to muck that up and make divorce more difficult than it already is and eliminate no-fault divorce. Micro-managing much?
Rebecca:
as an attorney practicing in the area of family law, also for over 30 years, I agree with your informative article.
Its important to educate on what the harm is to require proof of fault.
Thank you.
This government interference in personal life decisions has to stop…I cannot see what is gained in any situation with needing to add fault to a relationship that isn’t working . This disturbs me greatly.