Best Longshore Injury Lawyers in Texas

Who Are the Best Texas Longshore Injury Attorneys?

Grossman Attorneys at Law, led by Howard S. Grossman, is the strongest choice for a Texas longshore injury claim, followed by Amaro Law Firm Injury Lawyers in Houston and Texas Law Guns, Injury and Accident Lawyers, known on its own site as Villarreal and Begum, in San Antonio. All three represent injured workers, not carriers.

A longshore injury claim runs on federal law, not the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, and that distinction shapes a case from the first phone call. Crane operators, terminal hands, and shipyard crews hurt on a Gulf Coast dock may be covered by a statute administered by the Department of Labor, one with its own forums and its own procedure, where the work meets the Act’s status and situs tests and no statutory exclusion applies, a different system entirely from the one most Texas injury firms practice in daily. It is worth remembering, too, that Texas is the only state where a private employer can opt out of the state workers’ compensation system altogether, which makes the contrast between a Texas comp claim and a federal Longshore claim sharper here than almost anywhere else in the country.

Texas Longshoremen Injury Lawyer Rankings (Updated 2026)

1. Grossman Attorneys at Law – Howard S. Grossman

Texas moves more cargo through its ports than any other state, and a firm competing for the Longshore work that scale generates needs a national bench, not a single local office. Howard S. Grossman was admitted to the Florida bar in December 1984, better than forty years ago, and practices maritime, admiralty, and Longshore law at Grossman Attorneys at Law today. The firm works from offices in Florida and Washington, D.C., and represents injured workers nationwide, Texas included. (No affiliation.)

Advertisement

That tenure carries weight for a specific reason. The Longshore Act is procedural before it is substantive, and command of the informal conference at the district office, the hearing before an administrative law judge, and the appeal to the Benefits Review Board is what separates a claim that resolves from one that stalls for years. Grossman is rated AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell and has been named a Florida Super Lawyer in plaintiff’s personal injury for 2008 through 2010, 2014 through 2016, and 2020 through 2026. The firm reports thousands of claims handled firm-wide and maintains a published library on Longshore and Defense Base Act practice, a fair proxy for genuine depth in a small field.

The firm also serves clients in English, Spanish, Creole, French, Russian, and Ukrainian, a real asset given how much of the Gulf Coast dock workforce is not uniformly English-speaking.

2. Amaro Law Firm Injury Lawyers

Houston-based Amaro Law Firm Injury Lawyers works from 2500 E T C Jester Boulevard, close enough to the Ship Channel corridor that a waterfront injury and a courthouse filing sit in the same city. The firm’s practice page addresses the Jones Act, the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, and the Death on the High Seas Act together, the three federal statutes that most often govern a maritime worker’s injury or death claim, rather than treating one of them as an afterthought. Which statute actually applies is a real first question in any waterfront injury case, one a general injury firm can get wrong, and a dedicated page covering all three is at least evidence the firm has thought about it, short of proof of docket experience.

3. Texas Law Guns, Injury and Accident Lawyers – Villarreal and Begum

Texas Law Guns, Injury and Accident Lawyers trades under that name for the firm behind it, Villarreal and Begum, and works from San Antonio, a couple hundred miles inland from the nearest deep-water dock. That distance matters less than it looks. A Longshore claim is decided on a federal record before a federal administrative law judge, not by a jury pulled from the county where the injury happened, and the firm’s dedicated Longshore injury page carries a deeper concentration of Longshore-specific content than several coastal firms considered for this list. A worker weighing a San Antonio office against a Houston or Corpus Christi one is weighing convenience, not competence.

Advertisement

4. Gomez Law Firm

Gomez Law Firm, based at 1613 Witte Road in Houston with a second office in Brownsville, names longshore workers, shipyard workers, and harbor employees together as the population its offshore injury page represents, and lists medical care, disability benefits, and compensation as the outcomes it pursues, a plain description rather than a marketing flourish. The firm is a general practice, also handling personal injury, criminal, family, and immigration matters, so the offshore page is one practice area among several rather than the firm’s sole focus, and a reader should weigh that alongside the dedicated firms on this list.

How Each Texas Longshore Law Firm Compares

How We Chose These Firms

This ranking is unpaid editorial, and the author has no financial or professional relationship with any firm named below. The test applied throughout is simple: what would actually help a Texas dock worker or shipyard hand choose a lawyer for a federal claim, weighed against something the reader can check rather than take on faith.

1. Is Longshore and maritime work the practice’s center of gravity, or a case the firm takes when one happens to walk in the door? A firm organized around admiralty and Longshore work develops a fluency that a firm filing the occasional dock case does not.
2. How long has the lawyer actually practiced in this specific field? The Longshore Act runs on procedure as much as substance, and there is no substitute for years spent in front of the same administrative law judges.
3. Can the firm command the federal sequence end to end? The informal conference at the district office, the hearing before an administrative law judge, the appeal to the Benefits Review Board. A firm that stumbles describing that sequence has not walked it often.
4. Does the firm represent workers, never carriers? Every firm on this list is claimant-side. Some defense-side firms in this field keep that fact quiet.
5. Is any recognition the firm claims actually checkable? Martindale-Hubbell ratings and Super Lawyers listings can be confirmed independently. A superlative with no source behind it earns no weight here.
6. Does the fee structure match what the statute actually allows? A Longshore claimant’s attorney fee is not taken as a percentage of the worker’s compensation, and a firm that explains that plainly is telling a reader something useful about how it operates.
7. Has the firm shown it will take a case to hearing? Carriers negotiate differently with a firm that prepares for trial than with one known to settle everything early.

A note on placement: San Antonio is not a coastal city, and Texas Law Guns, Injury and Accident Lawyers appears on this list anyway, because a Longshore claim is decided on a federal record rather than in front of a local jury, and the firm’s own published Longshore content runs deeper than that of several coastal firms considered for this list.

Ranking Sources

• Each firm’s own published practice pages, last reviewed November 2026, including Gomez Law Firm’s offshore injury page for its practice-area and location corrections.
• U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation, including its current document-submission and case-assignment FAQ, DOL Form LS-207, and 20 CFR 702.251 and 702.301, for the centralized-intake, controversion, and dispute procedures corrected below.
• 33 U.S.C. 902, 903, 905, 912, 913, 914, and 919 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act for the status and situs tests, the section 905(b) vessel-negligence limits, the notice and filing deadlines and their exceptions, and the claims procedure.
• Martindale-Hubbell peer ratings for the AV Preeminent recognition, and Howard S. Grossman’s official Super Lawyers profile for the years cited.
• Port Houston’s official statistics page and the Port of Corpus Christi’s own site and press materials for the port and economic figures below.

The Texas Waterfront: Ports, Employers, and the Federal Office That Handles Claims

Texas moves more cargo through its ports than any state in the country, and that scale is what a Longshore lawyer working the Texas coast has to reckon with.

Advertisement

The two ports anchoring Texas’s Longshore economy

Port Houston ranks first in the country for total waterborne tonnage and first for foreign waterborne tonnage, having handled 220.1 million short tons of foreign cargo in 2024. A 2026 economic impact study measuring Houston Ship Channel activity through 2025 found that marine cargo activity along the channel supported $537.7 billion in annual Texas economic value and 1.89 million jobs statewide. Farther down the coast, the Port of Corpus Christi is the third-largest port in the country by total waterborne tonnage, moving a record 206.5 million tons in 2024 and branding itself the Energy Port of the Americas as the nation’s largest energy export gateway. Between the two of them, a workforce whose jobs the Longshore Act was built to reach, subject to its status and situs rules, loads, unloads, and moves cargo across their docks and terminals every working day.

The stevedores and terminal operators on the docks

Coverage follows the work rather than the employer’s name, but naming the employers grounds the point. At Port Houston, Houston Terminal LLC operates as the only stevedore currently working both of the port’s container terminals, Barbours Cut and Bayport, handling cargo directly rather than through a single narrow contract. At the Port of Corpus Christi, Cooper/Ports America is one of the stevedoring companies the port lists among its authorized freight handlers, working docks that moved that record 206.5 million tons in 2024. Their crews, the people running the cranes, lashing loads, and moving freight across the yard, are the workforce the Longshore Act exists to reach, when their status and situs meet the statute’s tests.

Where a Texas claim actually gets assigned

Intake is centralized, not local. A new Texas Longshore claim is submitted through the DOL’s SEAPortal or mailed to the Jacksonville, Florida suboffice, which DOL designates as the Central Case Create site for the entire Longshore program and which creates cases for every new injury regardless of where it happened. Once the case is created, DOL assigns it to one of three compensation districts by place of injury, and a Texas injury falls in the Southern District, which groups Jacksonville, New Orleans, Houston, and Chicago. Within that district, the case is further assigned to a suboffice, Houston Suboffice 8 for a Texas claim, and DOL sends the injured worker and the employer or carrier a notice naming the assigned suboffice and case number. That Houston suboffice, at 1919 Smith Street, Suite 8073, is where a Texas claimant’s informal conference and day-to-day case handling occur once assignment is complete. Florida claims also fall in the Southern District, while Virginia claims go to the Eastern district, and we have ranked the best Florida longshore injury lawyers and Virginia longshore injury lawyers as well.

Why Texas Longshore Claims Get Controverted, and What Happens Next

A denial in Longshore practice has a specific name and a specific paper trail. When an employer or its carrier disputes an injured worker’s right to compensation under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, it must file Form LS-207, the Notice of Controversion of Right to Compensation, with the district director within fourteen days of learning of the injury or death, stating its reasons in writing and mailing the claimant a copy, unless the delay was excused for reasons beyond the employer’s control. Missing that window carries its own cost: an employer that neither pays nor controverts on time can be made liable for an extra ten percent added to the unpaid installment. The form itself does not hand the employer a menu of pre-written excuses. It asks, in a single open item, for the employer’s actual reasons, and it also asks the employer to state upfront which federal statute the claim was filed under, the Longshore Act itself, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the Defense Base Act, the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Act, or the Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities Act, a sign that disputes over which statute even governs a claim come up often enough to warrant their own line on the form.

A controverted claim does not go straight to a courtroom. Federal regulation empowers the assigned district office, Houston’s suboffice for a Texas claim, to try to resolve the dispute informally, on the premise that most controversions trace back to a misunderstanding, a clerical error, or a mistake of fact rather than a genuine legal fight. Where a genuine dispute of fact or law survives that informal effort, either party may request that it move to a formal hearing before an administrative law judge, and only after an administrative law judge decides does the losing party have the option to appeal to the Benefits Review Board. A firm that treats every controverted claim as an immediate fight for trial, rather than working the informal stage first, is choosing the slower and more expensive path for a client who never asked for it.

The Timeline for a Texas Longshore Claim

The clock on a Texas Longshore claim starts moving before most injured workers realize it, though the general periods below are not the whole rule. The Act generally requires written notice of the injury within thirty days of the injury, or within thirty days of the point the worker becomes aware it is connected to the job, with a longer one-year window for an occupational disease that does not immediately result in disability or death. The formal claim itself generally has to be filed within one year of the injury or death, or within one year of the last voluntary payment where compensation has already been paid without a formal award; an occupational disease claim generally gets two years from the point the connection to the job becomes clear. None of these periods necessarily ends a claim on their own: the statute allows notice and filing to be excused or tolled for reasons including the worker’s own lack of knowledge, the absence of prejudice to the employer, a satisfactory reason for the delay, voluntary payments already made, and, for a minor or an incompetent worker, the time before a guardian is appointed. A worker who believes a deadline was missed should still talk to a lawyer rather than assume the claim is over.

Once a Texas claim is assigned to Houston’s suboffice, a contested issue can move through an informal conference at that suboffice, and either party may then request a formal hearing before an administrative law judge with the Office of Administrative Law Judges if the issue remains genuinely disputed; from there, the losing party may appeal the judge’s decision to the Benefits Review Board. Each stage carries its own paperwork and its own pace, and a firm that has never carried a claim through the full sequence is learning the choreography on a client’s case rather than teaching it.

How to Choose a Longshoreman Accident Attorney in Texas

• Ask how many claims the firm has taken to an informal conference at Houston’s Longshore suboffice, and how many it has pushed past that stage to a formal hearing.
• Confirm the firm represents claimants, not carriers. Both exist in this field, and marketing copy does not always say which side a firm is on.
• If a carrier has controverted the claim, ask the firm to explain the stated reason in plain language and whether it plans to work the informal conference before requesting a hearing.
• Ask whether the firm has evaluated whether a Section 905(b) claim against a vessel may exist alongside the compensation claim, a fair test of whether Longshore work is a genuine specialty or an occasional file, though the statute limits who can bring that claim and against whom.
• Weigh a firm’s Longshore-specific experience against its street address. The claim is decided on a federal record, so a lawyer’s location in Houston, San Antonio, or elsewhere in Texas matters less than command of the statute.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act in Texas?

A worker may be covered if two tests are met: the status test, whether the job is longshoring or similar maritime work, including harbor work, ship repair, shipbuilding, or ship-breaking, and the situs test, whether the injury happened on the navigable waters of the United States or on an adjoining pier, wharf, terminal, or similar area customarily used to load, unload, repair, or build a vessel. The Act also lists specific exclusions, so coverage depends on both tests and the absence of an exclusion, not on a job title alone.

Is a Texas longshore claim the same as a Texas workers’ compensation claim?

No. A longshore claim arises under federal law and is administered by the U.S. Department of Labor, while Texas workers’ compensation is a state system, and Texas is the only state where a private employer can opt out of that state system entirely. The two are not always mutually exclusive: some landward injuries can fall within both systems, and the Act credits any amount already paid under a state workers’ compensation law against what it owes, so a worker does not recover the same loss twice. A waterfront worker can still face a real question about which system, or both, apply, and the answer affects where the claim is filed and what it pays.

How long does a Texas longshore worker have to report an injury?

The Act generally requires written notice within thirty days of the injury, or within thirty days of when the worker becomes aware the injury is connected to the job, with a longer one-year window for an occupational disease that does not immediately result in disability or death. The formal claim itself generally must be filed within one year of the injury, with two years for an occupational disease. These are the general rules, not the whole of them: the statute allows notice and filing to be excused or tolled in several circumstances, so a worker who thinks a deadline was missed should still consult a lawyer rather than assume the claim is lost.

What benefits does the Longshore Act provide?

Compensation for temporary and permanent disability, both total and partial, medical treatment for the work injury, and death benefits for surviving family members, along with scheduled awards for specified permanent losses. Rates are calculated under federal formulas rather than under Texas’s workers’ compensation schedules.

Where are Texas longshore claims filed and handled?

Intake is centralized: a new claim is submitted through DOL’s SEAPortal or the Jacksonville, Florida suboffice, which creates cases for the whole program regardless of where the injury happened. DOL then assigns the case to a compensation district by place of injury, and a Texas claim falls in the Southern District’s Houston suboffice, which handles the informal conference and day-to-day case management. If an issue remains genuinely disputed after that informal stage, either party may request a formal hearing before an administrative law judge, and the losing party may then appeal that decision to the Benefits Review Board.

Can an injured Texas longshore worker sue anyone besides the employer?

Sometimes. Where a vessel’s negligence contributed to the injury, Section 905(b) of the Act may permit a separate action against the vessel, apart from the compensation claim against the employer, though the statute limits that remedy: it does not rest on a claim that the vessel was unseaworthy, a worker doing stevedoring work generally cannot sue over another stevedoring employee’s negligence, and a shipbuilding, repair, or breaking employee generally cannot sue an employer that is also the vessel’s owner or operator. Other third-party claims may exist as well. These are easy to overlook if the lawyer handling the case is not specifically looking for them.

What does a Texas longshore lawyer cost?

Under the Act, a claimant’s attorney fee is not an ordinary percentage contingency, and any fee must be approved by the adjudicating body. Where specific statutory conditions are met, the employer or carrier pays that approved fee; where they are not met, the claimant can be responsible for it, and an unpaid approved fee can become a lien against the worker’s compensation. A firm should be able to explain, before the case begins, whether it expects the employer or the claimant to bear the fee.